Enhancing Port Security and Predictive Maintenance with IoT: Cadets' Perspectives

Susi Herawati; Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan; April Gunawan Malau; Derma Watty Sihombing; Boedojo Wiwoho Soetatmoko Jogo; Ronald Simanjuntak

doi:10.38204/tematik.v11i1.1881

Susi Herawati Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)
Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran) Jakarta
April Gunawan Malau Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran) Jakarta
Derma Watty Sihombing Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran) Jakarta
Boedojo Wiwoho Soetatmoko Jogo Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran) Jakarta
Ronald Simanjuntak Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran) Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38204/tematik.v11i1.1881

Keywords: IoT, port security, predictive maintenance, transportation management, cadets' perspective

Abstract

This research explores the perspectives of 100 cadets studying multimodal transportation on integrating Internet of Things (IoT) to enhance port security and predictive maintenance. Using qualitative methods, including interviews and document analysis, the study investigates the effectiveness of IoT in real-time monitoring, data security, and predictive maintenance. The findings highlight cadets' recognition of IoT's potential to transform port operations, particularly in improving security measures and maintenance strategies. Cadets also emphasize the importance of professionalism and adherence to standards in IoT integration, valuing compliance with standards, understanding of IoT, training and education, and ethical considerations. The research underscores the need for continuous education and training programmes to prepare future industry professionals for the challenges and opportunities presented by IoT technologies. Overall, this study contributes to the advancement of knowledge in transportation management and education, offering insights for policymakers, industry practitioners, and educators on the integration of IoT in port operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Plaza-Hernández, A. B. Gil-González, S. Rodríguez-González, J. Prieto-Tejedor, and J. M. Corchado-Rodríguez, “Integration of IoT technologies in the maritime industry,” in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference, 2021, pp. 107–115.

Z. Zhao, K. M. Barijough, and A. Gerstlauer, “Deepthings: Distributed adaptive deep learning inference on resource-constrained iot edge clusters,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Des. Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2348–2359, 2018.

V. Roesler, E. Barrére, and R. Willrich, Special topics in multimedia, IoT and web technologies. Springer, 2020.

S. C. Mukhopadhyay, S. K. S. Tyagi, N. K. Suryadevara, V. Piuri, F. Scotti, and S. Zeadally, “Artificial intelligence-based sensors for next-generation IoT applications: A review,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 24920–24932, 2021.

A. Lei, H. Cruickshank, Y. Cao, P. Asuquo, C. P. A. Ogah, and Z. Sun, “Blockchain-based dynamic key management for heterogeneous intelligent transportation systems,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1832–1843, 2017.

P. L. Pallis, “Port risk management in container terminals,” Transp. Res. procedia, vol. 25, pp. 4411–4421, 2017.

J. Fei, Managing human resources in the shipping industry. Routledge, 2018.

N. Culkin, N. Morawetz, and K. Randle, “Digital Cinema as Disruptive Technology,” Information Communication Technologies and Emerging Business Strategies. IGI Global, pp. 160–178, 2007. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-234-3.ch009.

D. Gavalas, T. Syriopoulos, and E. Roumpis, “Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry,” J. Shipp. Trade, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11, 2022.

C. Comtois and B. Slack, “Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry,” in Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains, Routledge, 2017, pp. 249–262.

M. Brenker, S. Möckel, M. Küper, S. Schmid, M. Spann, and S. Strohschneider, “Challenges of multinational crewing: a qualitative study with cadets,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 16, pp. 365–384, 2017.

S. B. Merriam and R. S. Grenier, Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

H. Kim, J. S. Sefcik, and C. Bradway, “Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review,” Res. Nurs. Health, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2017.

Y. Darlington and D. Scott, Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Routledge, 2020.

J. M. Knies, “A qualitative study of college cadet women’s leadership identity development in a military training environment.” Virginia Tech, 2019.

N. C. Thanh and T. T. Thanh, “The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education,” Am. J. Educ. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 24–27, 2015.

I. de la Peña Zarzuelo, M. J. F. Soeane, and B. L. Bermúdez, “Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 20, p. 100173, 2020.

L. Da Xu and L. Duan, “Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–169, 2019.

G. N. Angafor, I. Yevseyeva, and Y. He, “Bridging the cyber security skills gap: Using tabletop exercises to solve the CSSG crisis,” in Joint International Conference on Serious Games, 2020, pp. 117–131.

L. Du, M. Wei, and K. Wu, “Information technology and firm’s green innovation: evidence from China,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 43, pp. 97601–97615, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29320-z.