Generic Qualitative Research In Management Studies
Although qualitative research becomes more widely accepted, however, its role in management studies is still underrepresented. This is because qualitative research requires an understanding of philosophy, terminology and theories which often presents conflicting perspectives. However, it should be noted that various qualitative research approaches started with generic qualitative research, which was considered easier to implement. Therefore, this article is aimed to provide insight into generic qualitative research and explain how to do it.
Ando, H., Cousins, R., & Young, C. (2014). Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: Development and refinement of a codebook. Comprehensive Psychology, 3(4), 2165–2228.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Bamberg., M., Levitt, H. M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods Research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist., 73(1), 26–46.
Bellamy, K., Ostini, R., Martini, N., & Kairuz, T. (2016). Seeking to understand: Using generic qualitative research to explore access to medicines and pharmacy services among resettled refugees. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 671–675.
Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research. Polity Press.
Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description: Approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4(1), 1–8.
Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Flick, U. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. In The SAGE Handbook. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n33
Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2015). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1772–1789.
Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Green, J., Willis, K., Hughes, E., Small, R., Welch, N., Gibbs, L., & Daly, J. (2007). Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 31(6), 545–550.
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591 –608.
Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2021). Essentials of consensual qualitative research. American Psychological Association.
Hussain, M. A., Elyas, T., & Nasseef, O. A. (2013). Research paradigms: A slippery slope for fresh researchers. Life Science Journal, 10(4), 2374–2381. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255–271.
Kennedy, D. M. (2016). Is it any clearer? Generic qualitative inquiry and the VSAIEEDC model of data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(8), 1369–1379. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/%0Aiss8/1
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.
Mack, L. (2010). The philosophical underpinnings of educational research. Polyglossia, 19, 5–11. http://www.apu.ac.jp/rcaps/uploads/fckeditor/publications/polyglossia/Polyglossia_V19_Lindsay.pdf
Merriam, S.B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 3–17).
Merriam, Sharan B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. a, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/January 11, 2016
Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understandings social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
Morse, J. (2019). Invited IIQM Conference keynote address (2019): The changing face of qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Gupta, R. K. (2014). Survey of qualitative research methodology in strategy research and implication for Indian researchers. Vision, 18(2), 109–123.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy, 17(5), 378–384.
Porta, D. della, & Keating, M. (2008). How many approaches in the social sciences? An epistemological introduction. In D. della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social science: A pluralist perspective (pp. 19–39). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
Runfola, A., Perna, A., Baraldi, E., & Gregori, G. L. (2016). The use of qualitative case studies in top business and management journals: A quantitative analysis of recent patterns. European Management Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.001
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9
Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). The sample size debate: response to Norman Blaikie. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 643–646.
Smith, J., Bekker, H., & Cheater, F. (2011). Theoretical versus pragmatic design challenges in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 39–51.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Routledge.
Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & MacDonald‐Emes, J. (1997). Interpretive description: A noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(2), 169–177.
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, creating impact (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.43.1.6
Tran, V.-T., Porcher, A., Falissard, R., & Ravaud, P. (2016). Point of data saturation was assessed using resampling methods in a survey with open-ended questions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 80, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.014.
Vaismoradi, M. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.
Van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2015). (I can’t get no) saturation: A simulation and guidelines for minimum sample sizes in qualitative research. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series, 15(5), 1–25.